Intent-Based vs Direct Bridge Routes
When you make a bridge request via the Metalayer SDK, Widget, or API, the system may route your transaction through different types of providers: Intent-Based Routes (this page focuses on these):- Across Protocol: Independent intent-based protocol using UMA for verification and settlement
- Relay Protocol: Independent intent-based protocol using direct rebalancing for settlement
- Eco Solver (Caldera): Metalayer-Powered solver focused on ETH and native tokens
- Eco Solver (Eco): Metalayer-Powered solver focused on stablecoin routes
- Native Bridges: Direct integration with L2 canonical bridges (Arbitrum, Optimism, etc.)
- Other Bridge Providers: Direct protocols without solver competition
How Intents Work
Declarative Execution
Developers specify what they want to achieve (the intent) without needing to define how it should be executed across different chains. This abstraction reduces complexity and potential errors in cross-chain operations.Competitive Solver Model
Intent-based protocols use a competitive solver ecosystem where multiple entities compete to fulfill user intents:- Fast-Fill Networks: Solvers use their own capital to instantly deliver assets on destination chains
- Competitive Fulfillment: Multiple solvers compete on speed, cost, and reliability
- Risk Management: Solvers temporarily take on cross-chain settlement risk
- Proof of Fulfillment: Solvers must provide cryptographic proof of completion via MetaProver
Settlement Mechanisms
Different intent-based protocols use different settlement approaches:- Across Protocol: Uses UMA’s optimistic verification system
- Relay Protocol: Uses direct rebalancing mechanisms
- Eco Solver: Uses Metalayer’s intent system on supported networks, Hyperlane for all networks
Intent Flow Example
Security Model
Intent Verification
- Cryptographic Commitments: Intents are cryptographically signed and immutable
- Execution Guarantees: System ensures intents are fulfilled as specified
- Proof of Fulfillment: Solvers must provide cryptographic proof of completion
Solver Network Security
- Capital Commitments: Solvers deploy their own liquidity and maintain inventory across chains
- Route-Level Limits: Caldera enforces per-route maximums and cooldowns to cap exposure
- Diverse Providers: Multiple external partners (Across, Relay, Eco) can service the same intent type
- Operational Monitoring: Real-time tracking of fill latency, rebalancing health, and fulfillment accuracy
Additional mechanics such as solver slashing and shared staking pools are on the roadmap and will be announced separately.